|
|
Empowerment is
providing employees with what they need so that they continually
increase
their individual and collective influence,
authority and accountability within “fences” – appropriate
limits or boundaries. |
In “empowered
organizations”,
the focus of motivation,
initiative and accountability is away from organizational
hierarchy
|
|
|
 |
and towards the individual |
|
REQUIREMENTS FOR EFFECTIVE EMPOWERMENT
Empowerment must be an evolutionary process and composed of the
following elements:
|
 |
Participation |
|
- participation is the opportunity to influence
decisions by having one’s ideas/viewpoints heard and truly valued; and,
an acceptance of the obligation to take responsibility and accountability – including
consequences positive or negative - for effectively implementing
and supporting decisions made.
- organizations must commit to the philosophy of seeking input
in
decisions from those significantly impacted and/or affected
by a
decision.
|
| Decision-making |
 |
|
-
organizations must shift the balance of decision making
types from a preponderance of Type 1 to the proper balance of
Types 1, 2, 3 and 4 as described in attachment 1.
-
the individual accountable for the results
of the decision in an area/function should lead a process of
determining the
respective type(s) of decision-making (attachment 1) that
will normally be applied
to the decisions made within his/her area or responsibility.
This process must take place in advance of really moving
forward with “empowerment”.
-
regardless of the type of decision making employed, gathering
input
and interacting with appropriate individuals and functions
to guide the decision making process must become an expected
norm of behavior on the part of all employees who occupy
leadership/decision making positions.
|
| Responsibility |
 |
|
"Empowerment" and "participation" are two-way
streets. Leaders must provide the opportunity, skills, support and
coaching to employees to encourage their input and participation.
Employees, on the other hand, must accept responsibility and accountability
for results – and their consequences - when they have been
effectively involved in the decision making process. |
 |
Information |
|
Empowerment and participation as well as involvement in the decision-making
process requires that employees have access to and understanding
of the information required to fully participate. Leaders must be
committed to and responsible for providing needed information in
ways that are meaningful for participants consistent with legitimate
business and confidentiality constraints. |
| Skills and tools |
 |
|
Empowerment, participation and involvement in the decision-making
process requires that all employees have the skills and tools needed
for effective participation. Leaders must be committed to and responsible
for
providing these skills and tools to all employees who are to take advantage of
them and to provide these skills and tools at the time and in the manner most
helpful to those employees. |
  |
Role and behavior changes |
|
The role and behavior of all employees who occupy positions of
leadership and authority in an organization must change, dramatically
and visibly, if empowerment, participation and involvement in the
decision making process is to occur in a meaningful and constructive
manner. Leaders must see their roles not as the ones who solve the
problem and/or have the answer. Rather, they must see their roles
as the one who facilitates getting the right people together at the
right time with the right information and tools so that the right decisions are made by the right people!
Structure, policies, procedures and practices
Leaders must insure that policies, practices, structures and procedures
support the empowerment process. All policies and structures must
match the values inherent in an empowered work force.
|
|
Start “tight” then “loosen up”;
not the other way around. |
|
As the process of empowerment
in begun, leaders must take great care not to, inadvertently,
create a situation in which employees
feel they have been “
set up”. Oftentimes, leaders announce empowerment, leading
employees to
believe that they are “empowered” to make decisions
that
|
| |
a. they should not be making,
b. ones for which they are not – at the time – capable of making.
Or
c. around which realistic and appropriate “fences” (limits and boundaries)
have not been articulated. |
|
The result is that leaders
then have to “pull the employees
back” causing
them to feel that they have been “set up to fail”. |
| When all else fails, ask them! |
 |
|
| Leaders wishing to implement empowerment should engage employees
within their area of accountability in a facilitated dialogue
to determine the: |
| |
a. decision making type (attachment 1) that
will normally be in place for the decisions to be made in the
area;
b. information, skills and tools required that will enable employees
to be responsibly involved;
c. “fences” (appropriate limits and boundaries) within which
employees must operate; and,
d. a mutually agreed upon implementation plan – for which ALL are mutually
responsible - for moving towards a truly empowered work environment |
|
Absent the successful implementation of this
type of process, expectations of all employees will go unmet and “empowerment” will
become just another failed program or promise!
CAVEAT: It is not empowerment when the boss says “You’re
empowered, but check with me before you do anything.”
Attachment 1
TYPES OF DECISION MAKING
|
| TYPE 1: |
Individual makes decision alone using available
information. May or may not make requests of and/or interact
with others in gathering facts to assist in the decision making.
Communications options:
a. others don't even need to know; no need to tell anyone else;
or,
b. advise others before the decision is implemented; or,
c. advise others after the decision is implemented
|
| TYPE
2: |
Individual shares the problem, question, situation with others
and gathers their suggestions/input. Individual then makes the
decision that may or may not coincide with their input.
Communications options:
a. advise others of situation, decision to be made and alternatives;
involve them in determining best solution; or,
b. advise others of situation, decision to be made, alternatives
and preferred solution; implement preferred solution unless
others provide input that changes decision makers mind.
|
| TYPE
3: |
Individual shares the decision situation with others and works
with others as colleagues to determine best decision. Individual
does not attempt to influence through use of authority and is
willing to accept and implement the consensus of the group.
Communications options:
a. advise others of the event and engage in joint problem solving;
or,
b. advise others of the event and ask them to come back with
recommendations for discussion and consensus building.
|
| TYPE
4: |
Individual and others agree that the "others" will
make the decision in the most appropriate manner.
Communications options:
a. others inform individual of decision made before implementation;
or,
b. others inform individual of decision made after implementation;
or,
c. others implement the decision and need not inform individual.
|
|
Attachment 2
DISCUSSION WORKSHEET |
1. Examples of situations where
people felt "empowered" or "disempowered"
2. Examples of situations where
people felt that they were “disempowered”.
3. Implications of "empowerment" on
leaders
|
| |